Notes and assumptions:
- No possibility of further tie games. (SF is left off the table except for the division tiebreaker.)
- Tiebreakers are as they would be at the end of the season, NOT as of right now. (Example: DAL and WAS can only be tied if DAL beats WAS.)
- Tiebreakers that don't affect playoff berths or seeding are ignored.
- Division ties are broken first. (Example: If MIN, CHI, and NYG all
finish 9-7, break the MIN-CHI tie first. Then apply the tiebreaker
between MIN and NYG.).
- If three or more teams are tied, apply that tiebreaker, not the two-team tiebreaker.
- Strength of victory is the combined winning percentage of the teams a team has beaten. It has nothing to do with point totals.
- Locked berths: none.
- Clinched divisions: GB, ATL.
- Clinched berths: ATL (#1 seed).
- Eliminated: PHI, DET, NO, TB, CAR, STL, ARI.
- The complete tiebreaker rules are here.
NFC Division Tiebreakers after Week 16:
Tied Teams | Record | Extra conditions | Winner | Why? |
NYG-WAS | 9-7 | | WAS | division record |
WAS-DAL | 9-7 |
| DAL | common opponents |
NYG-WAS-DAL | 9-7 |
| DAL | NYG eliminated on division record;
common opponents |
MIN-CHI | |
| MIN | division record |
SF-SEA | |
| SF | common opponents |
NFC Wild Card and Seeding Tiebreakers after Week 16 :
Tied Teams | Record | Extra conditions | Winner | Why? |
NYG-MIN | 9-7 | | NYG | conference record |
WAS-MIN | 9-7 | | WAS | head-to-head |
GB-SEA | 11-5 | | SEA | head-to-head |
CHI-SEA | 10-6 | | SEA | head-to-head |
MIN-SEA | 10-6 | | SEA | conference record |
Labels: football, NFC, NFL, tiebreakers |
Comments on "Simple NFC Tiebreaker Chart, 2012, After Week 16"
Thank you so much for doing the work on this. It is very helpful. Though I think you should list MIN-CHI, I believe MIN has clinched all tiebreakers over CHI (Especially if MIN beats GBY in Week 17) which is important to a lot of scenarios.
This is the best reference on the internet though, I found it last year as well. Well done.
Yeah, accidentally deleted MIN-CHI during one of the edits. Restore.d
Sorry to keep picking nits,
But I believe SEA wins all tiebreakers with SF on Conf Record.
Current Div Conf
SF 10-4-1, 2-2-1, 6-4-1
SEA 10-5 , 2-3 , 7-4
IF SF Tie, SEA Win
SF 10-4-2, 2-2-2, 6-4-2 (7-5)
SEA 11-5 , 3-3 , 8-4
IF SF lose SEA Tie
SF 10-5-1, 2-3-1, 6-5-1
SEA 10-5-1, 2-3-1, 7-4-1
My apologies, didn't realize common opponents takes precedent in division tiebreakers, my error.
Okay, I lied, I still think SEA wins all tiebreaks with SF, SEA currently trails SF by 1/2 a game, and they also trail by 1/2 game in common opponents. If they make up that 1/2 game in week 17 they will also make it up in the common game tiebreak, which means the Conf record tiebreak counts in which SEA would go from 1/2 game lead to a one game lead.
Showing my work.
Current, Div, Comm, Conf
SF 10-4-1, 2-2-1, 8-2-1, 6-4-1
SEA 10-5 , 2-3 , 8-3 , 7-4
IF SF Tie, SEA Win
SF 10-4-2, 2-2-2, 8-2-2, 6-4-2
SEA 11-5 , 3-3 , 9-3, 8-4
IF SF lose, SEA Tie
SF 10-5-1, 2-3-1, 8-3-1, 6-5-1
SEA 10-5-1, 2-3-1, 8-3-1, 7-4-1
SF SEA
GBY 1-0 1-0
DET 1-0 0-1
MIN 0-1 1-0
CHI 1-0 1-0
NYJ 1-0 1-0
BUF 1-0 1-0
MIA 1-0 0-1
NE 1-0 1-0
ARZ 1-0* 1-1
STL 0-1-1 1-0*
*remaining game
TOTAL 8-2-1 8-3
Ruh Roh, I'm wrong again,
SEA lost to STL, I have that marked wrong. SF has Common games locked up.
Like you said,
Why this thing you post is awesome :)!