Notes and assumptions:
- No possibility of tie games.
- Tiebreakers are as they would be at the end of the season, NOT as of right now.
- Tiebreakers that don't affect playoff berths or seeding are ignored.
- Divisional ties are broken first. To break a tie between NYJ, MIA, and BAL, first break the tie between NYJ and MIA.
- If three or more teams are tied, apply that tiebreaker, not the two-team tiebreaker.
- Strength-of-victory is the combined winning percentage of the teams a team has beaten. It has nothing to do with point totals.
- The AFC #6 seed will have at least an 8-8 record.
- Locked berths: IND #1, SD #2.
- Other clinched division: NE, CIN.
- Alive: NYJ, BAL, PIT, DEN, HOU, JAX, MIA.
- Eliminated: CLE, KC, OAK, BUF, TEN.
- The AFC wild card tiebreakers are insanely complicated.
- At least one wild card contender from each division will have 8 wins. The two-team interdivisional tiebreakers at 8-8 are thus irrelevant.
- If all the 8-7 teams win in Week 17, NYJ is the #5 seed and BAL is the #6 seed.
- NYJ wins each of its tiebreakers at 9-7.
- JAX wins each of its tiebreakers at 8-8.
- (removed - somehow I deleted the MIA-BAL-HOU tiebreaker).
- TEN loses each of its tiebreakers except for a two-team with HOU and so is eliminated.
- Important Week 17 games: NE @ HOU, PIT @ MIA, BAL @ OAK, JAX @ CLE, KC @ DEN, CIN @ NYJ (Sunday night).
- The complete tiebreaker rules are here.
AFC Tiebreakers after Week 16:Tied Teams | Record | Extra conditions | Winner | Why? | Divisional: | | |
| | MIA-NYJ | 8-8 | | MIA | head-to-head sweep | BAL-PIT | any | | BAL | division record | JAX-TEN | 8-8 | | JAX | division record | JAX-HOU | 8-8 | | JAX | head-to-head sweep | TEN-HOU | 8-8 | | TEN | division record | JAX-TEN-HOU | 8-8 | | JAX | round robin |
|
|
|
|
| Conference:
|
|
|
|
| NE-CIN | any | | likely NE | strength-of-victory | NYJ-BAL | 9-7 | | NYJ | common opponents | NYJ-PIT | 9-7 | | NYJ | conference record | NYJ-HOU | 9-7 | | NYJ | head-to-head | NYJ-DEN | 9-7 | | NYJ | common opponents | BAL-HOU | 9-7 | | BAL | conference record | BAL-DEN | 9-7 | | BAL | head-to-head | PIT-HOU | 9-7 | | HOU | common opponents | PIT-DEN | 9-7 | | PIT | head-to-head | HOU-DEN | 9-7 | | DEN | conference record | MIA-BAL-HOU | 8-8 | | MIA | HOU eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory
| MIA-BAL-JAX | 8-8 | | JAX | conference record | MIA-BAL-DEN | any | | DEN | strength-of-victory | MIA-PIT-DEN | 8-8 | | DEN | PIT eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | MIA-JAX-DEN | any | | JAX | conference record | MIA-TEN-DEN | 8-8 | | DEN | TEN eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | MIA-HOU-DEN | 8-8 | | DEN | HOU eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | NYJ-BAL-JAX | 8-8 | | JAX | conference record | NYJ-BAL-TEN | 8-8 | | NYJ | TEN eliminated on conference record; common opponents | NYJ-BAL-HOU | any | | NYJ | HOU eliminated on conference record; common opponents | NYJ-BAL-DEN | any | | NYJ | common opponents | NYJ-BAL-DEN | 8-8 | | likely DEN | BAL eliminated on common opponents; strength-of-victory | NYJ-PIT-HOU | 9-7 | | NYJ | conference record | NYJ-PIT-DEN | 9-7 | | NYJ | PIT eliminated on conference record; common opponents | NYJ-PIT-DEN | 8-8 | | likely DEN | PIT eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | NYJ-JAX-DEN | 8-8 | | JAX | conference record | NYJ-TEN-DEN | 8-8 | | likely DEN | TEN eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | NYJ-HOU-DEN | 9-7 | | NYJ | HOU eliminated on conference record; common opponents | NYJ-HOU-DEN | 8-8 | | likely DEN | HOU eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | BAL-JAX-DEN | 8-8 | | JAX | conference record | BAL-TEN-DEN | 8-8 | | BAL | TEN eliminated on conference record; head-to-head | BAL-HOU-DEN | any | | BAL | HOU eliminated on conference record; head-to-head | PIT-JAX-DEN | 8-8 | | JAX | conference record | PIT-TEN-DEN | 8-8 | | DEN | conference record | PIT-HOU-DEN | any | | DEN | conference record | MIA-BAL-JAX-DEN | 8-8 | | JAX | conference record | MIA-BAL-TEN-DEN | 8-8 | | DEN | TEN eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | MIA-BAL-HOU-DEN | 8-8 | | DEN | HOU eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | MIA-PIT-JAX-DEN | 8-8 | | JAX | conference record | MIA-PIT-TEN-DEN | 8-8 | | DEN | PIT & TEN eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | MIA-PIT-HOU-DEN | 8-8 | | DEN | PIT & HOU eliminated on conference record; common opponents | NYJ-BAL-JAX-DEN | 8-8 | | JAX | conference record | NYJ-BAL-TEN-DEN | 8-8 | | likely DEN | TEN eliminated on conference record; BAL eliminated on common opponents; strength-of-victory | NYJ-BAL-HOU-DEN | 9-7 | | NYJ | HOU eliminated on conference record; common opponents | NYJ-BAL-HOU-DEN | 8-8 | | likely DEN | HOU eliminated on conference record; BAL eliminated on common opponents; strength-of-victory | NYJ-PIT-JAX-DEN | 8-8 | | JAX | conference record | NYJ-PIT-TEN-DEN | 8-8 | | likely DEN | PIT & TEN eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory | NYJ-PIT-HOU-DEN | 9-7 | | NYJ | PIT & HOU eliminated on conference record; common opponents | NYJ-PIT-HOU-DEN | 8-8 | | likely DEN | PIT & HOU eliminated on conference record; strength-of-victory |
Strength of victory:Tied Teams | Team 1 | Team 2
| Team 3
| NE-CIN | NE
| CIN | | wins over: | ATL, BAL, BUF, BUF, CAR, (HOU), JAX, MIA, NYJ, TB, TEN
| BAL, BAL, CHI, CLE, CLE, DET, GB, KC, (NYJ), PIT, PIT | | current SOV wins: | 65
| 61 | | guaranteed Week 17 wins: | ATL or TB
| CHI or DET | | guaranteed Week 17 losses: | none
| none
| | needed Week 17 wins: | BUF v. IND (counts 2x) CAR v. NO JAX @ CLE MIA v. PIT TEN @ SEA
| BAL @ OAK GB @ ARI CLE v. JAX (counts 2x) KC @ DEN PIT @ MIA (counts 2x)
| |
|
|
|
| MIA-DEN at 8-8
| MIA
| DEN | | wins over: | BUF, CAR, JAX, NE, NYJ, NYJ, PIT, TB | CIN, CLE, DAL, KC, NE, NYG, OAK, SD | | current SOV wins: | 56
| 62 | | guaranteed Week 17 wins: | none
| KC
| | guaranteed Week 17 losses: | JAX, PIT
| none
| | needed Week 17 wins: | BUF v. IND CAR v. NO NYJ v. CIN (counts 2x) TB v. ATL
| CIN @ NYJ CLE v. JAX DAL v. PHI NYG @ MIN OAK v. BAL SD v. WAS
| |
|
|
|
| NYJ-DEN at 8-8
| NYJ
| DEN | | wins over: | BUF, CAR, HOU, IND, NE, OAK, TB, TEN
| CIN, CLE, DAL, KC, NE, NYG, OAK, SD | | current SOV wins: | 59
| 62 | | guaranteed Week 17 wins: | BUF or IND HOU or NE
| KC CIN
| | guaranteed Week 17 losses: | none
| none
| | needed Week 17 wins: | CAR v. NO TB v. ATL TEN @ SEA
| CLE v. JAX DAL v. PHI NE @ HOU NYG @ MIN SD v. WAS
| |
|
|
|
| MIA-BAL-DEN at 8-8
| MIA
| BAL | DEN | wins over: | BUF, CAR, JAX, NE, NYJ, NYJ, PIT, TB | CHI, CLE, CLE, DEN, DET, KC, PIT, SD
| CIN, CLE, DAL, KC, NE, NYG, OAK, SD | current SOV wins: | 56
| 47 | 62 | guaranteed Week 17 wins: | none | CHI or DET KC
| KC
| guaranteed Week 17 losses: | JAX PIT
| DEN PIT
| OAK | needed Week 17 wins: | BUF v. IND CAR v. NO NE @ HOU NYJ v. CIN (counts 2x) TB v. ATL | CLE v. JAX (counts 2x) SD v. WAS
| CIN @ NYJ CLE v. JAX DAL v. PHI NE @ HOU NYG @ MIN SD v. WAS |
Labels: AFC, tiebreakers |
Comments on "Simple AFC Tiebreaker Chart, 2009"
You don't have a scenario for Miami, NY, Balt, Pitt, Tenn, Houston and Denver all finishing 8-8. I think Miami can get in that way.
Thanks for pointing that out. I must have accidentally deleted the MIA-BAL-HOU scenario when I was revising the chart.
The chart and notes have been corrected.